Whatsapp I walked past the stage and sat down at the bar, the neon lights illuminating my pink teddy, shadowed eyes, and crimson lips.
This should be a place for constructive conversation. Also in the cause of clarity: I did not say that the Sagan quote is a defense of theism.
Physics Police And yet the quote stands in the middle of an argument over whether or not Cosmos did justice to theism in the first episode. In particular, we have Jerry, who agrees that Cosmos missed a chance to build bridges. If science is compatible with theism, he may have a point.
But science is NOT compatible with theism! If he keeps learning more and more science, there will be less and less room for theism. This is why theists fear science, and why Bruno was burnt at the stake.
And Sagan most definitely did believe in building bridges. He had zero room for mystical nonsense—but he very much wanted to make it clear that empiricism was not the enemy of spiritualism. Bruno is the right hero for Cosmos not only because he exemplifies this inherent conflict, but also because he was the first person since antiquity to call the stars other suns!
No matter how he arrived at it, this is a fantastic idea! You attempt to claim Sagan as a fellow religious apologist. He found in science a similar emotional joy that others derive from their faith. I quoted Sagan on spirituality—his word, not mine—and suggested that the quote had something for both sides to consider.
The responses here illustrate the delicacy of the task Sagan was attempting. But back to the subject at hand. Bruno was not executed for believing other stars are suns at least not primarily ; his personal cosmic beliefs, innovative as they were, were not integrated into a sophisticated Copernican worldview; he was not the first to suggest that stars are other suns that was Nicolas of Cusa, a century earlier ; and he was not the first to consider an infinite expanse of stars that was Thomas Digges.
Ye Olde Statistician And Nicholas of Cusa was made a cardinal of the Church, which should indicate that the concern did not center on cosmology per se, but rather on the religious uses some people made of it.
ModernEra Sagan would be appalled at the way an entire wing of American politics is denying the findings of the entire scientific community on religious grounds. Buddy That might come as a surprise to the Jesuits who run some of the most distinguished universities in the world, Georgetown for one.
Painting with such a broad kindergarten brush is a mark of a lazy mind.Research strategy & sources What was the favorite food of a famous person?
Excellent question with no simple answer. Biographers generally omit food-related information unless the person loved to eat, was a professional cook, cultivated exceptional gardens, or hosted fancy dinners.
She is interested in food science, food service, and nutrition education, and would like to implement nutrition education classes in a local school district.
She hopes to combine her knowledge in nutrition, culinary art, food science, and education to develop a school program that teaches nutrition fundamentals inside the classroom and prepares students to make healthy choices in school and at home. Significant Energy E vents in Earth's and Life's History as of Energy Event.
Timeframe. Significance. Nuclear fusion begins in the Sun. c. billion years ago (“bya”) Provides the power for all of Earth's geophysical, geochemical, and ecological systems, with the only exception being .
I walked past the stage and sat down at the bar, the neon lights illuminating my pink teddy, shadowed eyes, and crimson lips. I ordered my first drink of the night and took inventory of the club.
There were a few listless customers scattered around, hunching over bar stools, and a dancer circling the pole. Mar 10, · Along with his translations, Digges added commentary and new ideas, making it clear that the Copernican model was more than philosophy, it was a physically real model of the solar system.
I like the faith message that I get out of the "literary device" viewpoint. My only minor quibble is that the order of Genesis 1 is close enough to the natural scientific order.