Module Descriptions Introductory remarks The module handbook documents the current study program of the bachelor and master programmes at the Computer Science Department of the University of Kaiserslautern.
This page intentionally left blank Acknowledgements We wish to express our gratitude to the British Academy for magnanimously supporting the International Symposium on CounterCultures at the University of Nottingham 14—16 Septemberwhere the papers compiled in this volume were initially presented.
We would also like to thank the University of Nottingham for its aufgabenstellung master thesis architektur villa financial support towards the production of this volume.
Culture as Counter-Culture On 15 Marchtwo days after the Kapp Putsch, a painting by Rubens was damaged by a stray bullet during fighting in Dresden between opponents and supporters of the attempted right-wing coup.
Art is said to provide a spiritual haven, a transcendent vantage point from which the bourgeoisie can contemplate the everyday world with delight, secure in the knowledge that aesthetic culture invests life with meaning and significance.
What is needed, they conclude, is the development of an authentic working-class culture which rejects the bourgeois heritage in all its oppressive manifestations. It also compels us to reconsider the very notion of counter-culture, which all too often has tended to be associated with American and European radical movements of the s and s.
The West German context is discussed in Dirke, passim; the American situation is critically reviewed in Bell, — Culture as Counter-Culture 13 on culture and hegemony, the investigation of counter-culture immediately raises fundamental theoretical questions.
These concern the nature of culture; the relationship between culture and politics; the distinction between sub-cultures and counter-cultures; the class basis of culture and counter-culture; and the broader sociological frameworks within which culture, politics, class and dominant institutions may be configured.
These lists are graduate alumni who produced either a dissertation or a thesis within or related to the HTC discipline or are AKPIA SMArchS students. The thesis supervisor or committee chair is listed in parenthesis after each document title. Dissertations + Theses. For The Master of Science in Architecture Studies (SMArchS) or Master. Issuu is a digital publishing platform that makes it simple to publish magazines, catalogs, newspapers, books, and more online. Easily share your publications and get them in front of Issuu’s. The italien villa emerged as the castello "master bedroom" etc. is always possible and can even utilize certain valences or latencies offered within the free-form morphology. 2/93 - Patrik Schumacher - Theories Soja's main thesis is that geography can contribute to the.
At the same time, because Dirke focuses on counter-cultural movements in West Germany from the late s through to the mid s, she does not engage with a variety of issues which are relevant from a more expansive historical and theoretical perspective. Moreover, deploying the category of counter-culture as a tool of historical analysis also enables us to rethink contemporary controversies concerning, for example, the relationship between modernism and postmodernism, or the relative priority of the avant-garde — as opposed to counter-cultural manifestations — in initiating and defining radical artistic movements from the late nineteenth century onwards.
Instead of approaching the historical development of culture in linear or evolutionary terms, as one formation is succeeded by another in a process of inheritance or Aufhebung, the counter-cultural perspective outlined above suggests that our primary object of analysis might be not artistic evolution, but cultural revolution.
Similarly, attending to radical shifts and ruptures at the overarching historical or chronological level also raises questions concerning the internal cohesiveness of any particular cultural formation if such fundamental changes are to be possible. In 3 For further discussion, see the essays compiled in Giles, Theorizing Modernism.
Defining and deploying the category of counter-culture in these various ways would suggest that counter-culture can be conceived of in critical, historical, and even methodological terms. This discussion will be informed by the general assumption that cultural analysis must avoid the pitfalls noted by Adorno in his critique of traditional approaches to the sociology of music: She begins, though, by considering in more general terms the relationships between subcultures and counter-cultures, and culture and society.
While the term culture is often used, particularly in literary circles, to refer to the more elevated and edifying manifestations of human creative endeavour, it Introduction: Culture as Counter-Culture 15 may also be employed in a more comprehensive manner to designate the variety of ways in which we make sense of social relations.
The term hegemony refers to the ways in which dominant groups in a society establish the legitimacy of their position by means of consent rather than coercion, as the rest of society is encouraged to share in their views and values.
The emergence of counter-cultural groupings or beliefs implies at least a partial breakdown in hegemony, whilst the appearance of subcultures may question dominant values only marginally.
In her view, Countercultures position themselves explicitly and fundamentally against their dominant counterpart and try to develop an alternative way of life.
They challenge the hegemonic culture with a holistic approach, negating all of its values and traditions and struggling for radical and comprehensive change.
Dirke, 4 She therefore implies not only that counter-cultures are either intrinsically rejectionist or revolutionary, but also that they do not operate simply at the artistic or intellectual level: Such a conception of counter-culture may well apply to alternative social movements in the s and s, and evidently characterises proletarian cultural manifestations in the s, particularly in the early years of the Soviet Union.
He had previously argued that a Marxist critique of cultural texts should operate at three distinct levels, construed as concentric frameworks, first, of political history, in the narrow sense of punctual event and a chroniclelike sequence of happenings in time; then of society, in the now already less diachronic and timebound sense of a constitutive tension and struggle between social classes; and, ultimately, of history now conceived in its vastest sense of the sequence of modes of production and the succession and destiny of the various social formations.
Jameson now proposes that the emergence of all previous modes of production has been associated with cultural revolution, but goes on to 5 6 Jameson, The Political Unconscious, 17—; my discussion is based primarily on pp.
Culture as Counter-Culture 17 insist that the category of cultural revolution does not only apply to transitional epochs. This is because any society is characterised by a permanent process of conflict and struggle between antagonistic modes of production.
He concentrates instead on categories such as interruption and disjunction, and argues that innovations in the literary sphere involve a fundamental shift in the terms of reference of the literary system: Similarly, new artistic developments do not modify or amplify a tradition, but supplant existing forms.
He observes that any dynamic system necessarily generates its opposite within itself thanks to a dialectical process governed by chance developments, errors in and violations of that systemrather than referring to a properly Marxian dialectic grounded in the conflict between forces and relations of production.
Indeed, the development of modern art in particular seems to presuppose that the aesthetic value of a work entails a rejection of existing aesthetic norms, the consequence being that aesthetic value — and the nature of art — is inherently mutable.
The dynamics of normative change are dialectical in the manner outlined by Tynjanov, as Mukarovsky indicates that the aesthetic realm of culture is governed by a series of opposing factors whose conflictual and contradictory interaction generates cultural development.
At the same time, though, Mukarovsky also presents a more concrete and specific account of the societal dimension of aesthetic norms. Mukarovsky shows that in any social formation there simultaneously exists a variety of systems of aesthetic norms, which are in conflict and competition with one another.
My discussion here is based on Mukarovsky, 33— Culture as Counter-Culture 19 ethics, and vice-versa. Crucially, aesthetic norms share a key property of all norms, as they are organised on the basis of societal stratification and differentiation.
Just as we are able to express ourselves linguistically in various social dialects, so too, Mukarovsky maintains, we may well be conversant with a variety of aesthetic norms. Moreover, he continues, social stratification must be defined both vertically — in traditional social class terms — and horizontally, with reference to categories such as age, gender and occupational group categories which might, of course, be supplemented with others, such as religion and ethnicity.
It therefore follows that not only different social strata, but also different sectors within the same social stratum, may adhere to different and conflicting sets of aesthetic norms, so much so that they may even construct alternative artistic canons.
The interplay between social stratification, aesthetic norms and cultural canons also has an institutional dimension. Society has developed a range of agencies which, for example, regulate the evaluation of art-works and thus enable society to influence aesthetic value.
These institutional forms include literary criticism, public libraries, museums, academies, prizes, and even censorship.The master plan includes a culture school, an art museum, offices and hotel facilities, all surrounding a large cultural square in front of the sea.
See more expand. by Seok Min Yeo (MLA I '18) — Recipient of Masters in Landscape Architecture Thesis Prize II Thesis Craig Douglas and Rosalea Monacella, Faculty Advisors. The Cooper Union, open since , grants degrees in art, architecture and engineering and offers courses in continuing education in New York City's East Village.
Master of Architecture II Thesis | The Cooper Union. Nov 03, · Das Making-Off der Master-Thesis im Studiengang-Architektur. Der Film zeigt euch die wochenlangen Vorbereitungen bis hin zur finalen Präsentation der St.
The response of local communities was an attempt to domesticate - and master - the `foreign' body of the mission so as to create access to a larger world. This book focuses on the ensuing struggle, fought on many fronts, including medium of instruction and textbook content, with concomitant sub-texts relating to gender roles and sexuality.
Data: Page 1 of Catalogue Data in Spring Semester Agricultural Sciences Bachelor Bachelor Studies (Programme Regulations ) 2. Semester First Year Ex.